~kitterman suggested the sync on IRC: simon-o Hi, I'm looking at a package which FTBFS. There is a new upstream version with a "rewritten" build system. Imho it would be the easiest to sync the package from Debian, but I don't know if this is ok, this late in the cycle... 11:30 simon-o http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31810058/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.givaro_3.2.10-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz 11:30 ScottK simon-o: If the current package FTBFS, then we should consider it. 11:31
** Summary changed: - Sync givaro 3.2.13-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) + FTBFS: Sync givaro 3.2.13-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) -- FTBFS: Sync givaro 3.2.13-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456231 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
