Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkl...@gmail.com> writes:
> Assigning the bug to Jos, and leaving a few pointers behind...
> 1) Grab the source to Lintian in Lucid (apt-get source lintian, or dget
> the source .dsc file)
> 2) Look at checks/init.d*; Basically, these are getting applied to all
> scripts installed in /etc/init.d. We're dropping a symlink to
> /lib/init/upstart-job in /etc/init.d When examining a file, if it's
> really a symlink to /lib/init/upstart-job, skip over it.
> The two tags you're trying to silence are:
> * init.d-script-missing-lsb-section
> * script-in-etc-init.d-not-registered-via-update-rc.d
> when the file under scrutiny is a symlink to /lib/init/upstart-job.
> Looks like check/init.d, lines 184 and 254.
> Something like this might help:
> # Skip init scripts which are symlinks to /lib/init/upstart-job
> if ($filename =~ m,etc/init\.d/, && -l $filename) {
> my $link = readlink($filename);
> next if ($link =~ m,lib/init/upstart-job$,);
> }
Please do submit this as a Debian bug as well, since we'll be happy to
take this upstream in Debian. (Hopefully Debian will also eventually
switch to upstart.)
--
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
lintian should not complain about upstart jobs not looking like init scripts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496798
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
