I'd like to comment on this fix (e.g. cryptsetup -
2:1.0.6+20090405.svn49-1ubuntu7.2 w/watershed 4 and mountall 1.0):

I've been running with encrypted root/swap for a month, but then had
hardware problems forcing me to replace the system disk.  All was well
for nearly a week 5+ days and 6+ reboots, but now I'm seeing on boot
usually (but I can't say every time) the recovery shell message:

One or more of the mounts listed in /etc/fstab cannot be mounted:
/: waiting for /dev/mapper/xtremepapa-root
/tmp: waiting for (null)
/boot: waiting for /dev/disk/by-uid/blahblahblah
Press ESC to enter into a recovery shell

The first curious thing above is /tmp is not a separate file system and
thus not explicitly called out.

Secondly, when ESC to recovery, / is mounted (read-only), and a mount
-av  mounts /boot with no issues.  If I ctrl-D I go back to the shell
and see:

One or more of the mounts listed in /etc/fstab cannot be mounted:
/: waiting for /dev/mapper/xtremepapa-root
/tmp: waiting for (null)
Press ESC to enter into a recovery shell

Thirdly, when ESC to recovery, mount -o remount,rw / and ctrl-d again, I
proceed to boot with no further errors.

This feels like a race-condition, and seems new to recent updates,
though I guess it could be new simply because my new disk has gotten
progressively slower in the last 6 days and am thus more susceptable to
a race-condition, but from the bug responses to cryptsetup the last few
days, it appears I'm not alone.

Not knowing the true cause, I'm not sure if I should submit this as a
new bug, or if adding this information to this one which appears quite
similar should suffice.

Thanks & Regards,

== k ==

-- 
race condition between encrypted device creation and mountall probing with 
random-encrypted devices (swap, tmp)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/475936
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to