> As just written on irc, I agree that jocaml doesn't need a FFe (as I'd > also like to see the ocaml transtion getting done asap).
I would caution here to distinguish between "doesn't need a FFe" and "has been granted an FFe". I can't tell from reading this bug log whether you mean that the jocaml update doesn't include anything that's affected by FF, or that all ocaml-related packages have a blanket exception. I don't think we want to do the latter without knowing what kind of changes are included, or defining some limits on what's ok. -- [OCaml 3.11.2 transition][round 2/6] Please sync packages involved in OCaml transition from Debian sid to lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/522358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
