Here are new screenshots for Jaunty and Karmic. Each test ran for a good 25 minutes. I've also added a Karmic screenshot for 'top' showing (some of) the threads associated with the single Java process. In addition, I have copied my recent post (2010-03-10) to kernel- t...@lists.ubuntu.com :
-------- Can anyone tell me whether the Karmic kernel has implemented a different way of what it considers a process (as opposed to threads)? I have a situation where CPU load is zero on Karmic but considerably higher in Jaunty and earlier. The scenario is a single java process with many threads. The system has 4 cores and only one java process should logically produce a negligible CPU load but why was this not the case with earlier kernels? Has something changed in Karmic that would explain what I'm seeing? -------- -- [karmic] CPU load not being reported accurately https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
