I agree that we want to avoid shipping an intermediate solution with udev rules if xorg.conf.d is the long-term solution.
However, to the server, this will look equivalent to having an xorg.conf again, won't it? I know there have been significant behavior differences (and bugs) in the past between a server with no xorg.conf and one with an xorg.conf, even minimal. What sort of plan is there to regression-test this? -- FFE: xorg.conf.d/inputclass backport https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
