I see, thank your the message. Indeed, "Private" makes a nice contrast with "Public", but to keeping something "Private" within a filesystem isn't necessarily much connected with on-disk-encryption at all, or would you think otherwise?
I do understand we're not going to change the default crypt-dir name to something more precise just so, with that background. Would it make any sense in your eyes, though, to be more clear about distingushing (on- disk) encryption vs (private) access permissions in the naming? (Just to see if the point holds to any extent.) -- The default ~/Private name is not very clear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
