I must say I have a hard time understanding this decision. If it's a reasonable choice for the GNOME-based Ubuntu-variant to include GParted then I fail to see why including KDE Partition Manager in the KDE based variant "can do harm too easily".
I also fail to see why a GNOME user would need a partitioning tool on the install medium, but a KDE user would not. Are GNOME users in general so much smarter and computer-savvy then us KDE users? I find it deplorable that you refer KDE users to a GNOME-based recovery CD. (Disclaimer: I'm the KDE Partition Manager dev.) -- partition manager missing in kubuntu 10.04 lucid lynx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568993 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
