Dissenting Opinion - This should remain critical. If the mission is to offer an OS alternative to Microsoft, then the criticality of defects should be measured based on their likelihood of deterring Microsoft users from trying or staying with Linux/Ubuntu. Since the word is basically out that suspend/resume does not work (for various reasons in various numerous bug reports)on many/most machines out there, this is a critical issue because suspend/resume is a feature most users are aware of and a great many utilize. It is also considered a very basic feature that any useable OS would possess. Not being able to implement such a feature at this late date reflects very poorly on the usability of the OS, at least in the view of some prospective Linux converts. (And certainly having the user's session devolve to a state where neither the keyboard, mouse or display work could result in the loss of data.)
-----Original Message----- From: boun...@canonical.com [mailto:boun...@canonical.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Bader Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 2:55 AM To: s.farth...@comcast.net Subject: [Bug 553498] Re: Intel Core i3/i5/i7 hang on resume from suspend(SCI_EN) I lowering the importance as critical should be reserved for issues that cause the loss of data. Also Kamal, could you check current Maverick. I would think this should already be released there. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical => High -- Intel Core i3/i5/i7 hang on resume from suspend (SCI_EN) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553498 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Intel Core i3/i5/i7 hang on resume from suspend (SCI_EN) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553498 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs