On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 13:48 +0000, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> changing to low, it will not make any difference on how this bug is
> handled (it's not because a bug is a wishlist that it will not get
> solved and it's not because a bug has higher settings that will be
> worked quicker) but since you seem to care about random bug settings
> rather than about getting issues worked
It certainly does have an effect on people browsing for something to
fix. It appears that it is you who do not care about the bigger
picture. I do not appreciate your insults which have persisted over the
years; it is wholly unprofessional and uncalled for.
All I was asking was that the bug have a sane priority set to it.
Wishlist connotes that fixing it is nonessential to the system itself,
when in this case it is a user interface and user experience problem in
the default system. You said in another message that users may never
encounter it; well, they will encounter it the first time they try to
format an encrypted USB drive or whatever. That ability is exposed in
the user interface when you format media. If the media formatter didn't
have the ability to create encrypted media, it would not be expected to
work to create encrypted media out of the box.
What is so difficult about this request and its rationale? For
Maverick, there are three fixes for this bug: autoinstall cryptsetup
when necessary, install it by default, or have the media formatter
detect whether or not it is installed and only show the encrypted media
options if it is. There are other ways to fix the bug, sure, but
seriously, it's an issue that should be cared about if we actually give
a rat's rear about users having problems.
--- Mike
--
Should auto-install cryptsetup when not present and encrypted media inserted
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596165
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
