I have this problem as well and I think it's damn silly to allow selecting directories and then force users to have to also use the default one.
I don't know why this would be marked as low priority. It would seem to be an easy fix and so many users have complained about it. Is there a feeling that we darn well have to use the default backgrounds and so therefore this isn't a bug? I don't get it. Why can't it just be fixed by adding the default directory into the list as with other directories so that the users can remove it if they wish or leave it if they wish. -- wallpaper-tray always displays pictures from /usr/share/backgrounds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355081 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
