Surely the person that made this regression would have known the effect it would have?? I can't understand why this decision was made, but even after it was made I don't see how the change was then approved.
Coz's comments mirror my own feelings of this regression. I'm now wondering how the importance of this issue could still be "Undecided" when it's clearly quite a bad and annoying regression that should not (as least as far as I can see) have not been made in the first place. -- Dual Monitor wallpaper is not scaling across both monitors, same background is repeated on both monitors instead https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521492 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
