So long as the implementation of the atomics in libatomic-ops is correct, I don't see a strong need to change it. My view is that people shouldn't roll their own atomics implementations unnecessarily, but it's OK to use a library for it, so long as the library is correct.
The actual build failure here looks more like an issue with the exported headers from libatomic-ops than an issue with the _implementation_ of the operations -- is this a correct conclusion? -- armel build failure (sync primitives) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635388 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
