As mentioned in IRC w/ tseliot, it's better to pass the right argument for the architecture from the template than it is to add individual hacks along the way.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:54, Mario Limonciello <supe...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > However some distros do support an i386 or i686 kernel build. I'm thinking > RHEL specifically. > > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:44, Alex Chiang <achi...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> i686 is 32 bit, so yes, you would want to pass i386 in that >> scenario. >> >> Only x86_64 is recognized as 64-bit. >> >> If it will reduce confusion for future maintainers, you could >> s/i386/x86/ in that patch. >> >> The kernel Makefile recognizes both "i386" and "x86" as "do a >> 32-bit build". >> >> -- >> allow 32-bit module build on 64-bit host >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655275 >> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to dkms in >> ubuntu. >> > > > > -- > Mario Limonciello > supe...@gmail.com > -- Mario Limonciello supe...@gmail.com -- allow 32-bit module build on 64-bit host https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
