On Monday 15,November,2010 05:43 AM, ingo wrote: >> Status in “mountall” source package in Lucid: Fix Released > > But when - too late! > > Such things happen when releases are time based instead of "when it's > done". What is a LTS-release worth when takes months to become ready for > use.They are almost done approximately with second point release, so > remaining sevice period is by far less then advertised.
The bug was reported on 2010-04-29. When was Lucid released? 2010-04-29. Given the complexity of this bug, as you would have discovered if you had actually read through the original comments, it was not an easy one to identify. When did it get fixed *in Lucid*? 2010-05-09. That's 10 days after release. Ten days for a tough bug like this one. I believe we deserve a little credit. Then Mint appears, without deploying our patched packages properly, and a whole bunch of Mint users come here to complain that Mint doesn't work, and blame Ubuntu for it, and then talk about Mint's superiority. Oh, the irony. Thank you for trolling, guys. That was fun, wasn't it? > Why is Mint considering a Debian-based version? Hell if I know, and I don't give a damn. Maybe some other Ubuntu developers do, but I don't. Mint can do whatever they want. -- Kind regards, Loong Jin -- fsck progress stalls at boot, plymouthd/mountall eats CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571707 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
