What's the rationale to fix this in an SRU without any "real" changes?
The binary package exists in maverick, after all, in the current
version.
If we have something real to fix to the package, this can (and needs to)
be applied as well, of course, but by its own it doesn't really buy us
anything, just imposes the risk of a regression.
** Changed in: libdbd-sqlite3-perl (Ubuntu Maverick)
Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix
--
SRU to fix libdbd-sqlite3-perl ftbfs in maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631308
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
