Op 16-12-10 19:07, Till Kamppeter schreef:
> Your suggestion of modifiying the cost factors of the CUPS filters we
> have already applied in Maverick. Our implementation is a little
> different, we have only set
> application/postscript application/vnd.cups-postscript 65 pstops

I know. (See below).

> so that for a PostScript printer it is avoided to turn incoming
> PostScript into PDF and back into PostScript. If the incoming data is
> already PDF, there is not much difference whether one passes it through
> pdftopdf and then through pdftops or first through pdftops and then
> through pstops. The change especially eliminates PostScript to be turned

That's the theory. In practice, there *is* a difference.

> want to stay on LTS, please try also whether only setting

Yes we do.

> application/postscript application/vnd.cups-postscript 65 pstops
> in /usr/share/cups/mime/mime.convs already solves your problem. Please
> tell whether this works or only using

I did the trick with 65. But then customers complained that they could
not print PDF files, they sometimes would only print half, sometimes it
took very, very long. (I'm not sure if they would also crash the
printer) So that's why we also set the pdftops cost to 43.

So: only setting pstops to 65 does not solve the issue. My feeling is
that there's a problem within the filtering, one that's not easy to spot
but that pops up with the pstopdf stuff.

> SRU. Also try a Maverick live CD only to see whether Maverick has your
> problem solved without any additional changes.

It's only a couple of printers that crash, in live situations, with
print servers at customer premises. So it's a bit hard to check. I'll
see what I can do. Our own HP Laserjet doesn't crash, that's the main
problem ;-)

V.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691130

Title:
  PDF workflow flawed, crashes printers

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to