SRU Justification

Impact: extraneous meta packages make CDROM/DVD creation difficult
because of uninstallable packages.

 Feb 15 15:01:22 <cjwatson>      $ rmadison -s lucid-updates 
linux-backports-modules-wireless-lucid-server
 Feb 15 15:01:22 <cjwatson>      linux-backports-modules-wireless-lucid-server 
| 2.6.32.28.32 | lucid-updates | amd64, i386
 Feb 15 15:01:29 <cjwatson>      $ rmadison -s lucid-updates 
linux-backports-modules-compat-wireless-2.6.34-2.6.32-28-server
 Feb 15 15:01:32 <cjwatson>      
linux-backports-modules-compat-wireless-2.6.34-2.6.32-28-server | 2.6.32-28.27 
| lucid-updates | amd64
 Feb 15 15:01:57 <cjwatson>      there we see a difference, the underlying 
-server package is only built for amd64
 Feb 15 15:02:13 <cjwatson>      similar situation for generic-pae
 Feb 15 15:02:23 <cjwatson>      $ rmadison -s lucid-updates 
linux-backports-modules-wireless-lucid-generic-pae
 Feb 15 15:02:23 <cjwatson>      
linux-backports-modules-wireless-lucid-generic-pae | 2.6.32.28.32 | 
lucid-updates | amd64, i386
 Feb 15 15:02:23 <cjwatson>      $ rmadison -s lucid-updates 
linux-backports-modules-compat-wireless-2.6.34-2.6.32-28-generic-pae
 Feb 15 15:02:24 <cjwatson>      
linux-backports-modules-compat-wireless-2.6.34-2.6.32-28-generic-pae | 
2.6.32-28.27 | lucid-updates | i386
 Feb 15 15:02:43 <cjwatson>      so I diagnose the problem here as being that 
the metapackages are just built for architectures where they shouldn't be
 Feb 15 15:03:19 <cjwatson>      this is essentially harmless - the 
metapackages (linux-backports-modules-wireless-lucid-server/i386 and 
linux-backports-modules-wireless-lucid-generic-pae/amd64) are uninstallable on 
those architectures, but they're actually just supposed to be absent
 Feb 15 15:03:52 <cjwatson>      annoying and certainly a bug but not really a 
big deal, I think

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720139

Title:
  Kernel meta packages are built for wrong architectures.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to