Nope. Don't remember how I solved it, but I did eventually. Thank you for
asking!

On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 05:23, Andreas Moog
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Thanks for the report. Are you still experiencing issues?
>
> ** Changed in: bandwidthd (Ubuntu)
>   Importance: Undecided => Low
>
> ** Changed in: bandwidthd (Ubuntu)
>       Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677775
>
> Title:
>  package bandwidthd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
>  subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status
>  128
>
> Status in “bandwidthd” package in Ubuntu:
>   Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
>  Binary package hint: bandwidthd
>
>  I think the package is actually installed, and it failed to be removed
>  on two attempts with synaptic. Current error occurred after required
>  restart.
>
>  ProblemType: Package
>  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
>  Package: bandwidthd (not installed)
>  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.35-generic 2.6.35.4
>  Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64
>  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
>  AptOrdering:
>   bandwidthd: Purge
>   libjack0: Purge
>  Architecture: amd64
>  Date: Fri Nov 19 20:03:02 2010
>  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit
> status 128
>  SourcePackage: bandwidthd
>  Title: package bandwidthd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
> subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 128
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bandwidthd/+bug/677775/+subscribe
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677775

Title:
  package bandwidthd (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status
  128

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to