I'm not particularly well-equipped to diagnose exactly what the cause is, but neither version of the proposed dcraw.cc change appeared to solved the problem (or, for that matter, produce any noticeable difference). Building 0.18 [from the sid deb-src] did resolve the problem. So it appears this either demands further investigation on a more extensive back-port patch to support the S95, or can be solved by pulling ufraw 0.18.
P.S. I followed the directions here[1] with just ubuntu sources first, modified ufraw-0.16/dcraw.cc, and then ran dch -i, debuild, and dpkg -i for the resulting file (e.g. gimp-ufraw_0.16-3ubuntu1_i386.deb). If this method blows away local source modifications using the source tar or diff at debuild time or is otherwise an unsuitable build method, please let me know. [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian- reference/ch02.en.html#_porting_a_package_to_the_stable_system -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/724635 Title: Pull new dcraw.c to support Canon Powershot S95 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
