Launchpad has imported 7 comments from the remote bug at http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357687.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-06T19:08:41+00:00 Richard wrote: There is an upstream bug report regarding this that contains a patch: http://bugzilla.libsdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1090 Bug #354175 involves a program that is affected by this. Applying the upstream patch to media-libs/libsdl-1.2.14-r5 resolves it. The following commands can be used to test the patch: ebuild $(equery which media-libs/libsdl-1.2.14-r5) prepare cd /var/tmp/portage/media-libs/libsdl-1.2.14-r5/work/SDL-1.2.14 wget -O - http://bugzilla.libsdl.org/attachment.cgi?id=574 | patch --dry-run -p1 ebuild $(equery which media-libs/libsdl-1.2.14-r5) merge The other ebuild versions, including the media-libs/libsdl-1.2.13-r1 ebuild used by stable, are also affected. The following commands can be used to test the patch with media-libs/libsdl-1.2.13-r1: ebuild $(equery which media-libs/libsdl-1.2.13-r1) prepare cd /var/tmp/portage/media-libs/libsdl-1.2.13-r1/work/SDL-1.2.13 wget -O - http://bugzilla.libsdl.org/attachment.cgi?id=574 | patch --dry-run -p1 ebuild $(equery which media-libs/libsdl-1.2.13-r1) merge The reason we are seeing this issue in programs that rely on libsdl now is because of a change to glibc's memcpy() function late last year. The old implementation allowed programs to call memcpy() on overlapping regions. The new implementation copies memory in reverse, which broke any code that relied on the old implementation. The assumption that memcpy() works between overlapping regions of memory is illegal under ANSI C. There is a fairly lengthy bug report at the Fedora Linux bug tracker about this where Linus Torvalds commented on the issue: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638477 I recommend inserting media-libs/libsdl-1.2.13-r2 and media- libs/libsdl-1.2.14-r6 into the portage tree with this patch. I also strongly recommend removing the existing ebuilds from the portage tree. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libsdl/+bug/725044/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-06T19:14:27+00:00 Richard wrote: I made a small mistake in my previous comment. The commands to test the application of this patch to unstable should be: ebuild $(equery which media-libs/libsdl-1.2.14-r5) prepare cd /var/tmp/portage/media-libs/libsdl-1.2.14-r5/work/SDL-1.2.14 wget -O - http://bugzilla.libsdl.org/attachment.cgi?id=574 | patch -p1 ebuild $(equery which media-libs/libsdl-1.2.14-r5) merge The commands to test the application of this patch to stable should be: ebuild $(equery which media-libs/libsdl-1.2.13-r1) prepare cd /var/tmp/portage/media-libs/libsdl-1.2.13-r1/work/SDL-1.2.13 wget -O - http://bugzilla.libsdl.org/attachment.cgi?id=574 | patch -p1 ebuild $(equery which media-libs/libsdl-1.2.13-r1) merge Sorry about any confusion my mistake might have caused. I had already modified the ebuild in a local overlay, so when I was testing these commands, I had to first reverse the patch and then apply it. I accidentally copied one of the --dry-run commands I had done during the course of this and then carried that mistake over the other set I had posted. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libsdl/+bug/725044/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-06T19:23:32+00:00 Richard wrote: I just noticed that sys-libs/glibc-2.13-r1 is keyworded, so anyone affected by this is likely using the unstable tree. Please disregard the instructions I posted for users of the stable tree. As long as they do not unkeyword glibc, they will likely not need to worry about this. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libsdl/+bug/725044/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-06T19:24:26+00:00 Richard wrote: (In reply to comment #2) > I just noticed that sys-libs/glibc-2.13-r1 is keyworded, so anyone affected by > this is likely using the unstable tree. Please disregard the instructions I > posted for users of the stable tree. As long as they do not unkeyword glibc, > they will likely not need to worry about this. > Actually disregard comment #2. That was meant for bug #354175. I posted it in this bug by mistake. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libsdl/+bug/725044/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-08T22:10:00+00:00 Mr-bones- wrote: fixed in libsdl-1.2.14-r6 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libsdl/+bug/725044/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-09T01:53:06+00:00 Richard wrote: (In reply to comment #4) > fixed in libsdl-1.2.14-r6 libsdl-1.2.13-r1 also misuses memcpy(), so you might want to patch it too. Otherwise, this issue will occur again when glibc-2.13 becomes stable. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libsdl/+bug/725044/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-03-09T02:24:44+00:00 Mr-bones- wrote: guess we'll mark the later version of libsdl stable before making glibc-2.13 stable. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libsdl/+bug/725044/comments/8 ** Changed in: gentoo Status: Unknown => Fix Released ** Changed in: gentoo Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725044 Title: SDL rendering issue: graphic corruption while scrolling right -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs