Moreover, Ubuntu is loosing money thus there is no doubt of its importance. Another question is, if missing functionality is not an intention. I guess it must be otherwise Ubuntu would fix it long time ago. Dne 15.3.2011 15:26 "Paul Smith" <psm...@gnu.org> napsal(a): > I think it DOES meet the criteria for "high" importance, as described > here: > >>* Has a severe impact on a small portion of Ubuntu users (estimated) > > This is manifestly true since for that portion of ubuntu users that must > us a proxy, the impact is very severe (basically it's completely > unusable). And, I would even argue that the number of ubuntu users that > must use a proxy is not all that small. Considering the number of > subscribers and number of duplicates of this bug it's hard to understand > how this is not "high". > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387308 > > Title: > HTTPS Proxy Support for file sync > > Status in Ubuntu One Client: > Confirmed > Status in Ubuntu: > Invalid > > Bug description: > Ubuntu One file syncing should be fixed so that it works OK when a > proxy has been configured in System->Preferences->Network Proxy. > > I went ahead and modified the description of this bug to make it match > something that I think can be done as a first step. I'd like to get > regular proxy support working before trying to tackle authenticated > proxies and virus scanners. I've discussed this bug with a couple of > developers and we are looking into fixing it, so I'm also going to > increase the priority from wishlist. > > To unsubscribe from this bug, go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntuone-client/+bug/387308/+subscribe
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387308 Title: HTTPS Proxy Support for file sync -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs