> (In reply to comment #30) > (Apologies if this is bikeshedding or a repeat of previous discussion)
(Well-aimed kick to the shins) I don't think anything has changed since comment 5. See the last three paragraphs there. > Since we're deliberately changing the name, maybe libspidermonkey is a better > name? I agree that putting 185 in the name isn't good. When we change to > 1.9.0, > would we have to change the SO name? That can't be right. It isn't ideal, but it reflects reality. I would be thrilled to ship a SM with no stupid version number in its name. We should totally do that, as soon as have a sane upgrade story. First things first. Fixing SM versioning was a non-goal for this release. Help us get it right in the next one. (In reply to comment #32) > I don't think it matters a lot, honestly. I really would rather we ship. This, with a bullet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815 Title: [FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
