On 04/13/2011 10:21 AM, John Rigby wrote:
> More info, commenting out the lowest two operating points for 34xx makes
> the problem go away:
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/opp3xxx_data.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/opp3xxx_data.c
> index e71c5ba..06b6297 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/opp3xxx_data.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/opp3xxx_data.c
> @@ -105,11 +105,13 @@ struct omap_volt_data omap36xx_vddcore_volt_data[] = {
>  /* OPP data */
>  
>  static struct omap_opp_def __initdata omap34xx_opp_def_list[] = {
> +#if 0
>         /* MPU OPP1 */
>         OPP_INITIALIZER("mpu", true, 125000000, OMAP3430_VDD_MPU_OPP1_UV),
>         /* MPU OPP2 */
>         OPP_INITIALIZER("mpu", true, 250000000, OMAP3430_VDD_MPU_OPP2_UV),
>         /* MPU OPP3 */
> +#endif
>         OPP_INITIALIZER("mpu", true, 500000000, OMAP3430_VDD_MPU_OPP3_UV),
>         /* MPU OPP4 */
>         OPP_INITIALIZER("mpu", true, 550000000, OMAP3430_VDD_MPU_OPP4_UV),
> 

Rather than surrounding than unconditionally disabling this, could we
change "#if 0" to something like "#ifndef CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS". That way
people could still enable modes when not using a graphical display?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732912

Title:
  omapdss DISPC error: GFX_FIFO_UNDERFLOW

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to