On 11-06-20 07:10 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Christian, if you're using NFS root, you probably have an issue. But it > is probably not *this* issue, as this one was not specific to nfs root > configurations. It would be quite helpful if you were to raise a new bug > report against nfs-utils that detailed what you expect to have happen, > and what is actually happening.
But the question that begs to be asked is why are common configurations like NFS-root and separate /var and /usr filesystems STILL not part of Ubuntu's standard QA processes? These are not entirely "esoteric" configurations you know and they have been shown to have problems in past releases so why are current QA processes not testing for these? You do understand that effective QA means that when a configuration is shown to have a potential for regressions that such a configuration be added to the battery of tests that QA runs. It's simply not effective to identify a configuration that doesn't work, (think that you have) fix(ed) it and simply move on and not ever test that configuration again during a regular release cycle. That's exactly how regressions leak into GA product. It's embarrassing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525154 Title: mountall for /var races with rpc.statd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/525154/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
