On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 01:54:08AM -0000, Chris Halse Rogers wrote: > SRU team ack for the maverick-proposed upload. It has the unrelated > change of adding maverick-updates to the sources, but that seems > harmless.
Right, I added that as routine for post-release work so that future changes to incorporated d-i components are pulled in. > For the natty-proposed upload you've got an equivalent change to the > sources, but also an update to the partman-auto version. Was that > intentional? Given the low risk of regression I don't mind waving that > through either, but I'd just like to check. It was - I try to keep all the incorporated d-i components up to date. It shouldn't make much difference for ubiquity since it mainly affects LVM. Incidentally, this is going to be a bit non-trivial to test for maverick and natty. I'll probably roll new "daily" CD builds at some point so that somebody can do QA using those. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442941 Title: debconf failed to upgrade from 1.5.27ubuntu1 to 1.5.27ubuntu2: exit status 128 - Use of uninitialized value $reply in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Passthrough.pm line 66 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debconf/+bug/442941/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
