On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Paul Sladen <pkg-fo...@paul.sladen.org> wrote:
> My apologies for not being more explicit. *In light of the on-going > naming scheme change*, I would appreciate some guidance on what to > call binary fonts of varying formats derived from the same (source) > typeface. > > Having binary packages all called f-[f-]name but with different > contents (for example, TTF, vs. PSF) doesn't work. I would appreciate > some guidance, or suggestions on how to disambigute these. For > example the inclusion of 'psf-' or 'console-' as a prefix, or postfix. I think I would be putting all the formats in one package, or using fonts-[foundtry]-fontname-console. Are PSF files also used on the console on FreeBSD or Hurd? > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=otf2bdf&searchon=contents > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=bdf2psf&searchon=contents > http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=grub-mkfont&searchon=contents Ah, good! -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/724022 Title: Wishlist: Enable use of Ubuntu Mono as .psf console-setup font To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-font-family/+bug/724022/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
