Note that this release had one unverified bug and another bug which
failed verification in the SRU report page:

bug 805209: it's a revert of upstream commit which brought a regression,
and we don't do verification of reverted patches that were identified as
regressions. In this specific case though, the reporter also confirmed
the -proposed Maverick kernel solved the issue, so we have extra
confirmation that it's ok. I propose we always mark these "regression
revert" bugs as verification-done-*.

bug 790754: this one failed verification before, thus SRU patch was
reverted on this 2.6.35-30.56 release, so everything is ok also. Just
the bug is keep listed and marked failed in the SRU report page, as bugs
listed there are against previous release in -updates. Tracking the
reverts isn't done on SRU report page, so verification failed bugs are
kept listed and marked as failed, we will try to see what can be done to
enhance this to avoid confusion.

So this linux-lts-backport-maverick release is good to go.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811215

Title:
  linux-lts-backport-maverick: 2.6.35-30.56~lucid1 -proposed tracker

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kernel-sru-workflow/+bug/811215/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to