It's actually more minor than that. My point is just that if the ratings are used as part of an algorithm to determine scores (1 == less likely ; 5 == more likely), and if also 1 is unlikely to be chosen due to "awful" songs probably not being kept in the owner's collection, then the algorithm is off to a minor extent because the lowest practical score will be 2, thus throwing off the weighting of the star ratings. So by a simple change in terminology, which encourages 1-star ratings to be used more often, then the results of the algorithm should be improved. Hopefully that makes sense.
Thanks -- Ratings system in Amarok flawed / one star should be customizable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112489 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
