Scott, are you saying that using nautilus-sushi as the source package name and sushi as the binary is unacceptable, since there's already a sushi souce package name that doesn't actually use sushi as a binary?
Perhaps the sushi developer should have been more careful with choosing a name (but sushi-irc isn't packaged in Fedora). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/865058 Title: [FFe] [needs-packaging] sushi, the GNOME 3.2 previewer for Nautilus To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/865058/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
