On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:36 PM, d3ngar <d3n...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why won't Canonical address this problem? FGLRX is not that uncommon. > Very few people find Unity a 'suitable' replacement and it's sad to see > that we are essentially forced to migrate to a different distribution.
Hold on, did you find a distro where the FGLRX driver doesn't have this issue? Please reply with the distro, its version, and the version of fglrx. It would be very helpful, because as far as I am aware this problem is in ATI's hands. If someone has worked around it (even inadvertently) it would be really helpful. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/838577 Title: GNOME Shell display problems with FGLRX To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/838577/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
