Launchpad has imported 11 comments from the remote bug at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24163.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2005-10-01T16:24:48+00:00 Jwakely-gcc wrote: (I first posted this code to PR5660 but it's apparently a separate issue) template <typename T> struct A { typedef T Type; void f(Type) {} }; template <typename T> struct B : A<T> { typedef typename A<T>::Type Type; void ff(Type t) { f(t); } // XXX }; template struct B<int>; This should fail to compile, according to 14.6.2/3, but 3.4 - 4.1 (and probably earlier) accept it. If A::f and the call to it are changed to take no arguments (so that f is not a dependent name) then it fails, so it is apparently only at instantiation that the base class scope is examined. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cryptopp/+bug/915018/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2005-10-01T16:28:10+00:00 Pinskia wrote: Confirmed. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cryptopp/+bug/915018/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2005-10-01T16:48:44+00:00 Jwakely-gcc wrote: Adding "... in template" to end of title. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cryptopp/+bug/915018/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-12-05T00:01:56+00:00 Pinskia wrote: *** Bug 42291 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cryptopp/+bug/915018/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-12-05T00:03:48+00:00 Pinskia wrote: This is related to PR 15272 where we look at both dependent and non dependent base classes when only non dependent should be looked at. Actually I think this is a dup of that bug but I will leave it to a C++ expert. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cryptopp/+bug/915018/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-11-30T19:14:37+00:00 Pinskia wrote: *** Bug 43282 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cryptopp/+bug/915018/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-02-02T11:57:52+00:00 Redi wrote: *** Bug 47585 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cryptopp/+bug/915018/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-05-20T18:01:27+00:00 Jason-gcc wrote: Author: jason Date: Fri May 20 18:01:22 2011 New Revision: 173965 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173965 Log: PR c++/24163 PR c++/29131 gcc/cp/ * pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build) [CALL_EXPR]: Avoid repeating unqualified lookup. * semantics.c (perform_koenig_lookup): Add complain parm. * cp-tree.h: Adjust. * parser.c (cp_parser_postfix_expression): Adjust. (cp_parser_perform_range_for_lookup): Adjust. libstdc++-v3/ * include/ext/pb_ds/assoc_container.hpp: Explicitly qualify calls to functions from dependent bases. * include/ext/pb_ds/detail/rb_tree_map_/erase_fn_imps.hpp: Likewise. * include/ext/pb_ds/detail/rb_tree_map_/ split_join_fn_imps.hpp: Likewise. * include/ext/pb_ds/detail/splay_tree_/erase_fn_imps.hpp: Likewise. * include/ext/pb_ds/detail/splay_tree_/insert_fn_imps.hpp: Likewise. * include/ext/pb_ds/detail/splay_tree_/splay_fn_imps.hpp: Likewise. * include/ext/pb_ds/detail/splay_tree_/ split_join_fn_imps.hpp: Likewise. * include/ext/pb_ds/detail/tree_policy/ order_statistics_imp.hpp: Likewise. * include/ext/pb_ds/detail/trie_policy/ prefix_search_node_update_imp.hpp: Likewise. * include/ext/rc_string_base.h: Likewise. * include/ext/rope: Likewise. * include/ext/ropeimpl.h: Likewise. * testsuite/util/exception/safety.h: Likewise. * testsuite/util/native_type/native_priority_queue.hpp: Likewise. * testsuite/util/testsuite_io.h: Likewise. * include/std/functional: Declare mem_fn earlier. * include/tr1/functional: Likewise. * include/tr1/exp_integral.tcc: Declare __expint_E1 earlier. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/koenig9.C Modified: trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c trunk/gcc/cp/semantics.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/pr47615.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/overload/defarg1.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tc1/dr213.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr34850.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr39362.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.brendan/crash56.C trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/memtemp47.C trunk/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pb_ds/assoc_container.hpp trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pb_ds/detail/rb_tree_map_/erase_fn_imps.hpp trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pb_ds/detail/rb_tree_map_/split_join_fn_imps.hpp trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pb_ds/detail/splay_tree_/erase_fn_imps.hpp trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pb_ds/detail/splay_tree_/insert_fn_imps.hpp trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pb_ds/detail/splay_tree_/splay_fn_imps.hpp trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pb_ds/detail/splay_tree_/split_join_fn_imps.hpp trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pb_ds/detail/tree_policy/order_statistics_imp.hpp trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pb_ds/detail/trie_policy/prefix_search_node_update_imp.hpp trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/rc_string_base.h trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/rope trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/ropeimpl.h trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/std/functional trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/exp_integral.tcc trunk/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/functional trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/exception/safety.h trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/native_type/native_priority_queue.hpp trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_io.h Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cryptopp/+bug/915018/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-05-20T18:57:08+00:00 Jason-gcc wrote: Fixed for 4.7. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cryptopp/+bug/915018/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-07-07T21:29:33+00:00 Jason-gcc wrote: *** Bug 47752 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cryptopp/+bug/915018/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-12-29T14:45:14+00:00 Redi wrote: *** Bug 51699 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cryptopp/+bug/915018/comments/10 ** Changed in: gcc Status: Unknown => Fix Released ** Changed in: gcc Importance: Unknown => Medium ** Changed in: cryptopp Status: Unknown => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915018 Title: gcc 4.7.0 fixes a bug that Crypto++ 5.6.1 relies on To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cryptopp/+bug/915018/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
