Launchpad has imported 12 comments from the remote bug at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17325.

If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment
will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about
Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at
https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2008-08-27T12:03:28+00:00 Pavol Rusnak wrote:

Created attachment 18543
mandriva patches against xdm 1.1.8

XDM lacks consolekit support. This results in various problem when XDM
is used to login into desktop: for example, DBus messages are blocked by
PolicyKit.

I found a set of patches from KDM adapted to XDM in Mandriva SRPMS, but
I wonder why they are not upstreamed.

CCing SUSE and Mandriva Xdm maintainers.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lqueue/+bug/585853/comments/0

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2008-10-13T13:25:15+00:00 Pavol Rusnak wrote:

Paulo (pcpa): are there any specific reasons why these patches are not
upstreamed?

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lqueue/+bug/585853/comments/1

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2008-10-13T17:54:22+00:00 Pcpa wrote:

(In reply to comment #1)
> Paulo (pcpa): are there any specific reasons why these patches are not
> upstreamed?

  None that I know of. But I am afraid I don't understand consolekit
very well. I did the patch upon request, based on kde3 kdm's patches.

  But I was told it is working correctly.


Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lqueue/+bug/585853/comments/2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2008-10-13T19:46:48+00:00 Alan Coopersmith wrote:

While I don't understand what all the changes in those patches are for,
I do understand the GPLv2 header in the new consolekit files - X.Org does
not accept any GPL licensed code in our apps, so these patches will not
be acceptable until relicensed under an MIT-style license.

>From a technical standpoint:
- 0004-Support-kdm-extended-syntax-to-reserve-a-server-for.patch 
   - is this really needed for consolekit?   This seems unrelated.

-0005-Initialize-the-greeter-only-after-checking-if-the-th.patch 
   - seems reasonable, though I wonder about side-effects in people's
     setup scripts, if any assumed the xdm greeter window was displayed first

-0006-Ass-console-kit-support-to-xdm.patch
   - I might make this a bit less #ifdef heavy, but it seems okay

-consolekit-xdm/0007-Add-files-required-by-consolekit-support.patch
   - I don't know enough dbus or consolekit to comment on most of this
   - The /proc/%d/stat section would need to be #ifdef linux

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lqueue/+bug/585853/comments/3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2009-08-08T10:08:56+00:00 Sndirsch-suse wrote:

Created attachment 28437
xdm-consolekit.diff

This is a patch by Takashi Iwai we're planning to use for openSUSE 11.2.
See

  https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528829

for more details.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lqueue/+bug/585853/comments/4

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-04-03T10:14:43+00:00 Sndirsch-suse wrote:

Created attachment 34643
xdm-consolekit.diff

Now with better error message when console-kit-daemon is not
available/running

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lqueue/+bug/585853/comments/5

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2010-09-11T16:45:16+00:00 Sndirsch-suse wrote:

It seems nobody apart from Mandriva/openSUSE is interested into having
this support in xdm. Hence closing as WONTFIX.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lqueue/+bug/585853/comments/20

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-01-28T14:38:33+00:00 Samuli Suominen wrote:

(In reply to comment #6)
> It seems nobody apart from Mandriva/openSUSE is interested into having this
> support in xdm. Hence closing as WONTFIX.

Untrue as both ArchLinux and Gentoo are carrying custom patch to enable
native ConsoleKit support in XDM too.

Can we reopen this bug, please?

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lqueue/+bug/585853/comments/35

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-01-28T16:56:38+00:00 James H. Cloos Jr. wrote:

Four downstream dists seem like enough.

Reviews of each of the three as of yet unreviewed patches are welcome.

These urls are mentioned in Gentoo’s patch:

http://bugs.gentoo.org/360987
http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/plain/trunk/xdm-consolekit.patch?h=packages/xorg-xdm
http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2011-February/019615.html
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615020


Samuli:  I don’t see any license info in the patch in portage; it is 
definitively under an MIT-style license?

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lqueue/+bug/585853/comments/36

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-01-28T18:05:57+00:00 Alan Coopersmith wrote:

(In reply to comment #8)
> Four downstream dists seem like enough.
> 
> Reviews of each of the three as of yet unreviewed patches are welcome.

Yes, as maintainer, I've been waiting for someone to review the patches
on the xorg-devel list (since I don't have time to learn enough about the
consolekit API myself to figure out if they're doing the right things) and 
not really caring if someone is playing games with the bug state here 
because they're feeling pissy.

Hopefully between those four dists you can find at least *one* person
willing to put in the time to give the patches a review.

I will impose only two absolutely required conditions on such patches:
 - Unlike the first set submitted for this bug, they must be under a
   MIT license, not changing the xdm license to GPL or anything else.
 - They must do whatever autoconf or other checks are necessary to 
   avoid breaking systems without consolekit.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lqueue/+bug/585853/comments/37

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-01-28T20:28:08+00:00 Samuli Suominen wrote:

(In reply to comment #8)
> Four downstream dists seem like enough.
> 
> Reviews of each of the three as of yet unreviewed patches are welcome.
> 
> These urls are mentioned in Gentoo’s patch:
> 
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/360987
> http://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/plain/trunk/xdm-consolekit.patch?h=packages/xorg-xdm
> http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2011-February/019615.html
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615020
> 
> 
> Samuli:  I don’t see any license info in the patch in portage; it is
> definitively under an MIT-style license?

The patch in Arch and Gentoo is modified (improved) copy of the OpenSuSE
patch. So license is presumably same as what OpenSuSE is using for their
patch.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lqueue/+bug/585853/comments/38

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 2012-01-28T20:31:57+00:00 Samuli Suominen wrote:

(In reply to comment #9)
>  - They must do whatever autoconf or other checks are necessary to 
>    avoid breaking systems without consolekit.

This seems to be covered with the Arch/Gentoo patch based on testing.
Tested it pretty exhaustively before pushing it to our users.

Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lqueue/+bug/585853/comments/39


** Changed in: xorg-server
       Status: Won't Fix => In Progress

** Bug watch added: Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #528829
   https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528829

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #615020
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615020

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585853

Title:
  Not possible to use xdm/wdm, only can use gdm (Lucid, Maverick)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lqueue/+bug/585853/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to