On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Martin Pitt <martin.p...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > Before it was much easier for an user to say "ah, that > program again, already reported or I don't want to", now you need to > wait for the full data collection first. Bear in mind that in some cases > this might even involve interactive questions, which sounds like an > excessively high price for telling you the name of the program.
Hi Martin, >From your perspective and given the solution Matthew presents above, is it sufficient to make this change and leave the rest of the current behavior as-is? That is, the UI is hidden and the process spins away in the background, continuing to collect the additional information and then quitting. Or would you prefer to see something that communicates to the thread that it needs to commit suicide at this point? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938707 Title: Hard to see which program crashed for "Internal error" reports To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/938707/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
