> I don't think we'll cover this particular use case for Precise. Excuse me, but how is installing bind9 or dnsmasq a "particular use case"? I'm talking about the default installation, not some corner case...
> most cases will not actually see bind and NetworkManager installed on the same system We have 250 schools here that use NetworkManager and dnsmasq as the DNS server, are there any stats that show that this is actually rare? And, actually more rare than the split VPN need that the local resolver addresses? Since the local resolver implementation seems a bit immature and needs to break two packages in order to work, one of them in main, wouldn't it be better if it was postponed and not be applied in an LTS release until it's more cooperative? Kind regards, Alkis Georgopoulos -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037 Title: Don't start local resolver if a DNS server is installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/959037/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
