Hi, Sitsofe Wheeler [2007-06-01 16:44 -0000]: > Martin: Since it looks like we are headed for another change I think > the word has to be put out to those who have gone and relabelled > their /etc/fstab with the /dev/h??? syntax that we are now going > back the other way. The folks over in bugs like Bug #94119 need to > be warned that their CD drives are going to go back to being broken. > Perhaps people need to be told what grub /module options can be > added to diable ata_piix. People need to be warned not to upgrade to > -16. People need to prepare for another round people having binary > driver breakage
Right, all of this needs to happen in the USN. The USNs already explain the ABI change consequences. > Does the update go out as -security given that it's not fixing a > security problem any more? What does -security mean? Yes, it needs to go to -security, since it was broken in -security. The problem was that -security was abused to introduce changes which were not security related, so we cannot just let them stay there. > Also what happens to the current renaming bugs? Are they just closed? Do > we just open a new bug if/when another "great renaming" happens? Is it > worth trying to fix the PATA bugs being masked on SATA machines? Do we > just close those bugs too? I leave that to the kernel folks. -- latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
