Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: software-properties-gtk
instead of writing a custom python solution, why isn't apt-spy utilized?
I have found the python implementation to be somewhat slow and less than
ideal. Does anyone else agree?
$ aptitude show apt-spy
Package: apt-spy
New: yes
State: not installed
Version: 3.1-16
Priority: optional
Section: universe/admin
Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Uncompressed Size: 197k
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.5-0ubuntu1), libcurl3 (>= 7.15.5-1)
Description: writes a sources.list file based on bandwidth tests
Parses a list of mirrors and tests each of the mirrors for bandwidth. Writes a
/etc/apt/sources.list file based on the responses it gets.
** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
software-properties-gtk should be eplaced by apt-spy backend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119251
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
