I have noticed that fedora has decided to give up the traditional
'monolithic' packaging of texlive and take a way that looks rather
interesting, namely the semi-automatized conversion of packages from the
texlive package manager to rpm.

See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive
"Upgrade TeX Live to at least 2011. Use packaging based on upstream metadata 
and don't use monolithic build any more."

This is not yet ready for the large public, but already alive, working
and testable. Should be in the beefy miracle.

Seems a rather interesting approach. If it works for them, It will make redhat 
forget for ever the times when their tex was always 2-4 years late.  Also it 
gives an amazing granularity on what gets installed: you can install schemes, 
but also go down to things like
# yum install 'tex(epsfig.sty)'
to install a single latex style

I now wonder if their infrastructure can be converted to package to deb.

Please give advice about making a blueprint with Fedora's approach.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905328

Title:
  [needs-packaging] Texlive installer package should be created

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/905328/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to