Why is that a difference in a legal sense? A package can also e.g. be limited to non-commercial use only, even though its binaries are just packaged within the distribution. We do not prompt the user to tell them this non-commercial restriction. I do not see what the crucial difference is between a downloader package and prepackaged binaries. In both cases it has been verified that the files in question are indeed legally distributable.
-- msttcorefonts installs non-free fonts automatically and doesn't ask if user agrees with license https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84453 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
