Launchpad has imported 29 comments from the remote bug at https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=232628.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-29T23:49:24+00:00 X-wstephenson wrote: Version: (using Devel) Installed from: Compiled sources Crashes just after displaying the album contents on startup. 1.2.0 on KDE 4.4.2. Backtrace follows ==2493== Thread 1: ==2493== Invalid read of size 8 ==2493== at 0xA2D9401: QTimeLine::stop() (qtimeline.h:139) ==2493== by 0x6DD13B: Digikam::RatingWidget::setFadingValue(int) (ratingwidget.cpp:170) ==2493== by 0x6BB034: Digikam::ImageRatingOverlay::slotEntered(QModelIndex const&) (imageratingoverlay.cpp:126) ==2493== by 0x76255F5: Digikam::AbstractWidgetDelegateOverlay::qt_metacall(QMetaObject::Call, int, void**) (imagedelegateoverlay.moc:151) ==2493== by 0x6BB66F: Digikam::ImageRatingOverlay::qt_metacall(QMetaObject::Call, int, void**) (imageratingoverlay.moc:74) ==2493== by 0xA38D78E: QMetaObject::activate(QObject*, QMetaObject const*, int, void**) (qobject.cpp:3293) ==2493== by 0x9581A74: QAbstractItemView::entered(QModelIndex const&) (in /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4.6.2) ==2493== by 0x6A851A: Digikam::ImageCategorizedView::slotDelayedEnter() (imagecategorizedview.cpp:408) ==2493== by 0x6AA28B: Digikam::ImageCategorizedView::qt_metacall(QMetaObject::Call, int, void**) (imagecategorizedview.moc:107) ==2493== by 0x692E8F: Digikam::DigikamImageView::qt_metacall(QMetaObject::Call, int, void**) (digikamimageview.moc:113) ==2493== by 0xA38D78E: QMetaObject::activate(QObject*, QMetaObject const*, int, void**) (qobject.cpp:3293) ==2493== by 0xA38A3E2: QObject::event(QEvent*) (qobject.cpp:1212) ==2493== Address 0x8 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd ==2493== KCrash: Application 'digikam' crashing... Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f9e61f4c860 (LWP 1373)): [KCrash Handler] #5 d_func (this=<value optimized out>) at tools/qtimeline.h:139 #6 QTimeLine::stop (this=<value optimized out>) at tools/qtimeline.cpp:723 #7 0x00000000006dd13c in Digikam::RatingWidget::setFadingValue (this=0xe3fc30, value=255) at /usr/src/debug/digikam-1.2.0/digikam/ratingwidget.cpp:170 #8 0x00000000006bb035 in Digikam::ImageRatingOverlay::slotEntered (this=0xe3f320, index=...) at /usr/src/debug/digikam-1.2.0/digikam/imageratingoverlay.cpp:126 #9 0x00007f9e5f4a15f6 in Digikam::AbstractWidgetDelegateOverlay::qt_metacall (this=0xe3f320, _c=InvokeMetaMethod, _id=<value optimized out>, _a=0x7fffd3407730) at /usr/src/debug/digikam-1.2.0/build/digikam/imagedelegateoverlay.moc:151 #10 0x00000000006bb670 in Digikam::ImageRatingOverlay::qt_metacall (this=0x0, _c=255, _id=14764688, _a=0xfffffffffff6938a) at /usr/src/debug/digikam-1.2.0/build/digikam/imageratingoverlay.moc:74 #11 0x00007f9e5c6c678f in QMetaObject::activate (sender=0xd32470, m=<value optimized out>, local_signal_index=<value optimized out>, argv=0xfffffffffff6938a) at kernel/qobject.cpp:3293 #12 0x00007f9e5d773a75 in QAbstractItemView::entered(QModelIndex const&) () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 #13 0x00007f9e5d777f28 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 #14 0x00007f9e5d77f158 in QAbstractItemView::mouseMoveEvent(QMouseEvent*) () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 #15 0x00007f9e5d796ce1 in QListView::mouseMoveEvent(QMouseEvent*) () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 #16 0x00007f9e5f4ac73c in KCategorizedView::mouseMoveEvent (this=0x0, event=0xff) at /usr/src/debug/digikam-1.2.0/libs/widgets/common/kcategorizedview.cpp:1121 #17 0x00007f9e5f480098 in Digikam::DCategorizedView::mouseMoveEvent (this=0xd32470, event=0x7fffd3408970) at /usr/src/debug/digikam-1.2.0/libs/widgets/common/dcategorizedview.cpp:597 #18 0x00007f9e5d2afdcf in QWidget::event(QEvent*) () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 #19 0x00007f9e5d6545b6 in QFrame::event(QEvent*) () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 #20 0x00007f9e5d783a6b in QAbstractItemView::viewportEvent(QEvent*) () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 #21 0x00007f9e5f482d0f in Digikam::DCategorizedView::viewportEvent (this=0xd32470, event=0x7fffd3408970) at /usr/src/debug/digikam-1.2.0/libs/widgets/common/dcategorizedview.cpp:704 #22 0x00007f9e5c6b2d97 in QCoreApplicationPrivate::sendThroughObjectEventFilters (this=<value optimized out>, receiver=0xdd6af0, event=0x7fffd3408970) at kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:819 #23 0x00007f9e5d259dec in QApplicationPrivate::notify_helper(QObject*, QEvent*) () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 #24 0x00007f9e5d260bdb in QApplication::notify(QObject*, QEvent*) () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 #25 0x00007f9e5deed456 in KApplication::notify(QObject*, QEvent*) () from /usr/lib64/libkdeui.so.5 #26 0x00007f9e5c6b398c in QCoreApplication::notifyInternal (this=0x7fffd3409690, receiver=0xdd6af0, event=0x7fffd3408970) at kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:704 #27 0x00007f9e5d25fdb6 in QApplicationPrivate::sendMouseEvent(QWidget*, QMouseEvent*, QWidget*, QWidget*, QWidget**, QPointer<QWidget>&, bool) () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 #28 0x00007f9e5d2df765 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 #29 0x00007f9e5d2de47a in QApplication::x11ProcessEvent(_XEvent*) () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 #30 0x00007f9e5d308932 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 #31 0x00007f9e5576adee in g_main_context_dispatch () from /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 #32 0x00007f9e5576e7b8 in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 #33 0x00007f9e5576e8e0 in g_main_context_iteration () from /usr/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 #34 0x00007f9e5c6dceb3 in QEventDispatcherGlib::processEvents (this=0xab6500, flags=<value optimized out>) at kernel/qeventdispatcher_glib.cpp:412 #35 0x00007f9e5d30851e in ?? () from /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4 #36 0x00007f9e5c6b22a2 in QEventLoop::processEvents (this=<value optimized out>, flags=) at kernel/qeventloop.cpp:149 #37 0x00007f9e5c6b267c in QEventLoop::exec (this=0x7fffd34095c0, flags=) at kernel/qeventloop.cpp:201 #38 0x00007f9e5c6b63cb in QCoreApplication::exec () at kernel/qcoreapplication.cpp:981 #39 0x000000000077d34b in main (argc=<value optimized out>, argv=<value optimized out>) at /usr/src/debug/digikam-1.2.0/digikam/main.cpp:193 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-30T09:42:40+00:00 Caulier-gilles-9 wrote: Marcel, Johannes, Sound like a problem from model view port. Right? Gilles Caulier Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-30T13:24:09+00:00 Johannes Wienke wrote: Hm I don't think so. This looks like a crash directly in the rating widget in setFadingValue. Can anything strange happen there if value is 255? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-30T13:37:02+00:00 X-wstephenson wrote: Last night it just looked like the fading animation had not yet been instantiated when setFadingValue was called from that code path. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-30T17:58:27+00:00 Kevin-kofler wrote: Changing the if (d->fadingValue >= 255) at digikam/ratingwidget.cpp:168 to if (d->fadingValue >= 255 && d->fadingTimeLine) should fix this crash. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-30T19:13:16+00:00 Johannes Wienke wrote: *** Bug 232734 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-30T20:13:48+00:00 Johannes Wienke wrote: SVN commit 1109177 by jwienke: Fix crash in rating widget. Thanks for the hint. BUG: 232628 M +2 -2 NEWS M +1 -1 digikam/ratingwidget.cpp WebSVN link: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=rev&revision=1109177 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-03-31T09:27:51+00:00 Julien wrote: What is the impact of this bug ? maybe a 1.2.1 would be nice to have ? because it may take time before the new database features in 1.3.0 branch are stable. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-04-02T13:59:52+00:00 U-simone wrote: (In reply to comment #7) > What is the impact of this bug ? maybe a 1.2.1 would be nice to have ? because > it may take time before the new database features in 1.3.0 branch are stable. I vote for a 1.2.1! Right now I can't use digikam (without downgrading, that is) and it's one of the my favourite applications - and one of the best features of kde! Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-04-02T14:31:40+00:00 Kevin-kofler wrote: Just apply this patch: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/digikam/devel/digikam-1.2.0-kde232628.patch?revision=1.1&view=markup or nag your distributor to apply it if you're using binary packages. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-04-15T20:07:25+00:00 Neoclust-kde wrote: *** Bug 234469 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-04-16T10:10:21+00:00 Caulier-gilles-9 wrote: *** Bug 234516 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-04-17T09:09:59+00:00 Neoclust-kde wrote: *** Bug 234586 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-05-05T20:36:34+00:00 der_FeniX wrote: Created attachment 43277 New crash information added by DrKonqi Crash. Just open, select an album and open preview or simply wait a few seconds. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/23 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-05-06T08:46:03+00:00 Caulier-gilles-9 wrote: Fenix, This file is fixed in current code from svn trunk (next digiKam 1.3.0) Gilles Caulier Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-05-09T14:33:32+00:00 Mark Purcell wrote: *** Bug 236930 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-05-10T11:45:23+00:00 Caulier-gilles-9 wrote: *** Bug 236989 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/26 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-05-10T11:53:11+00:00 Caulier-gilles-9 wrote: *** Bug 236621 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/27 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-05-11T09:32:35+00:00 Caulier-gilles-9 wrote: *** Bug 237161 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/28 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-05-17T22:27:11+00:00 Johannes Wienke wrote: *** Bug 237979 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/29 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-05-18T09:02:54+00:00 Caulier-gilles-9 wrote: *** Bug 237981 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-05-23T21:47:30+00:00 Johannes Wienke wrote: *** Bug 238605 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-05-27T05:35:59+00:00 Caulier-gilles-9 wrote: *** Bug 238962 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/32 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-06-02T11:36:10+00:00 Johannes Wienke wrote: *** Bug 240436 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/33 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-08-11T21:02:43+00:00 Johannes Wienke wrote: *** Bug 247413 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/34 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-08-12T14:23:28+00:00 Marcel-wiesweg wrote: *** Bug 246369 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/35 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-08-13T11:19:51+00:00 Marcel-wiesweg wrote: *** Bug 246534 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/36 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-08-14T15:55:55+00:00 Neoclust-kde wrote: *** Bug 246846 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/37 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-08-14T15:56:06+00:00 Neoclust-kde wrote: *** Bug 246899 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/comments/38 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to digikam in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565604 Title: digikam 1.2 crashes on kubuntu 10.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/digikam/+bug/565604/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs