Sorry, but what's the justification for this being an SRU? Yes, the libxml2-dev package is wrongly marked as co-installable, but I don't see how the impact of this warrants an SRU - especially given this:
> [Regression Potential] xml2-config reports the libdir is /usr/lib, while the > actual ones are /usr/lib/<triplets>. This might break applications whose > build system can't find libraries correctly in the previous path but relies > on xml2-config's output. I recommend to use pkg-config instead of this > script. That's not an ignorable regression potential; there's a huge number of packages in Ubuntu that build-depend on libxml2-dev, and we don't know which of any of them, or what third-party software, is affected by this change. Given that this is only a -dev package that's affected, not a runtime package, I don't think it makes sense to SRU this - and I certainly don't think it warrants priority: high. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987502 Title: libxml2-dev: /usr/bin/xml2-config isn't identical across all arch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libxml2/+bug/987502/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
