Launchpad has imported 43 comments from the remote bug at https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187587.
If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at https://help.launchpad.net/InterBugTracking. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-03-19T11:13:18+00:00 Simon-44ecklpsr wrote: Version: 2.1-SVN (using 4.2.67 (KDE 4.2.67 (KDE 4.3 >= 20090318)), Gentoo) Compiler: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc OS: Linux (x86_64) release 2.6.26-tuxonice hi, it seems cue sheets are still under development so this is just a reminder: * please also integrate the tracks defined in the cue sheet in the collection * use cue sheet bookmarks for file that are in collection (currently works only when addy files using the file browser) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-08-03T12:09:50+00:00 nitro322 wrote: I've been testing out Amarok 2.1 and I noticed that bug 145661 is still present. Is fixing this behavior included in your reminder (I'm not really sure what that second bullet is supposed to mean)? If so, great! If not, I'll open a new bug report as to not hijack this one. Thanks. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-08-03T12:31:27+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: Jared, the current testing environment is 2.2-git. Please check the current bugs lists at http://tinyurl.com/ourbugs and http://tinyurl.com/needsinfo before filing a new bug. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/8 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-09-21T10:26:06+00:00 Casey Link wrote: *** Bug 191185 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-09-21T14:59:22+00:00 Lenzenmi wrote: *** This bug has been confirmed by popular vote. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/10 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-11-20T12:04:44+00:00 Komodo wrote: Hi, something new ? I really miss this feature. I am not a programmer, but i don't understand where is the problem if it was fully working in 1.4. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2009-11-20T12:20:50+00:00 Fedora wrote: Martin, you can not compare Amarok 2.x with Amarok 1.x. Amarok 2 has (almost) been a complete rewrite of the 1.x series and therefore it doesn't mean if it "was there" in 1.4, that it will be back in 2.0. I still miss this feature too. I guess we have to wait just a little bit longer. :) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-01-11T10:42:30+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: Moving to bugs Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-01-11T10:43:34+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: *** Bug 222157 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-08-11T08:35:37+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: *** Bug 230272 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-08-11T20:36:06+00:00 RussianNeuroMancer wrote: About marking 230272 bug as duplicate. If 230272 is duplicate then this bug can be closed only when Amarok will support embedded cue. I want to warn - support of embedded cue is a another difficult task then just support external cue (what about this bug), and better to implement cue support step by step - support external cue for first, and support of embedded cue later. Then better set 230272 openede like a different bug. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-08-11T20:40:24+00:00 jernejovc wrote: What about if developers would first try to implement a partial solution like looking for cue sheet in a directory where file from collection is stored? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/18 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-08-11T20:43:16+00:00 RussianNeuroMancer wrote: Yes, this is exactly what I propose. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-08-11T20:56:47+00:00 nitro322 wrote: (In reply to comment #11) > What about if developers would first try to implement a partial solution like > looking for cue sheet in a directory where file from collection is stored? Amarok already does that. However, it uses the cue sheet in a broken manner as described in bugs 209341 and 145661. I'd really rather see the developers prioritize fixing the existing cue sheet support before adding any new features. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-10-28T09:31:20+00:00 Vovochka wrote: It's Amarok 2.3.2 But amarok still doesn’t react right on cue files in collections. cue albums presents as a single file. Not as separate files :( Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/21 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-12-11T12:01:53+00:00 Hagai Kariti wrote: Still doesn't work correctly in 2.6 Beta2. cue sheets albums in the collection are presented as single tracks (no bookmarks either). However, it seems to work correctly when adding cue albums not from the collection - if I drag the FLAC file to the playlist from a directory that's part of the collection, it doesn't work; if I symlink it to a different place it does work. Dragging the cue sheet doesn't work either way. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/22 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-12-11T18:23:01+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: I am sure you mean 2.4 beta 1, there hasn't been any other release since. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/23 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2010-12-11T19:05:26+00:00 Hagai Kariti wrote: whoops, my bad. 4.6 beta2, amarok 2.4 beta1 :) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-01-02T21:01:34+00:00 False-Flax wrote: Created attachment 55484 patch I made a patch for Amarok 2.3.2 as a temporary solution. It works for me and my collection. Required to re-add tracks to the playlist. Does not work for drag-and-drop, only from popup menu. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-01-04T15:24:25+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: Thanks for the patch, Anton. Could you please submit it to http://git.reviewboard.kde.org ? (you will need to register with http://identity.kde.org first) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/26 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-01-04T20:28:43+00:00 False-Flax wrote: (In reply to comment #19) > Thanks for the patch, Anton. Could you please submit it to > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org ? (you will need to register with > http://identity.kde.org first) I did it. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/27 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-01-17T09:53:16+00:00 Simon-44ecklpsr wrote: still missing feature from 1.4 as the patch didn't get accepted Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/28 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-01-21T22:03:05+00:00 Razvan-petruescu wrote: (In reply to comment #6) > Martin, you can not compare Amarok 2.x with Amarok 1.x. Amarok 2 has (almost) > been a complete rewrite of the 1.x series and therefore it doesn't mean if it > "was there" in 1.4, that it will be back in 2.0. > > I still miss this feature too. I guess we have to wait just a little bit > longer. :) and longer...and longer...and longer...and longer...and longer (should I continue?) Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/29 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-05-10T04:02:18+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: *** Bug 272879 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-06-04T12:11:30+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: This is an automated message from the triager: Amarok 2.4.1 has been released on May 8 already. Could you please upgrade and test if you can still reproduce this bug? Without feedback within a month we will close this bug as resolved. Thank you for your understanding. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/31 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-06-04T13:07:14+00:00 sdeber wrote: (In reply to comment #24) > This is an automated message from the triager: > > Amarok 2.4.1 has been released on May 8 already. Could you please upgrade and > test if you can still reproduce this bug? > > Without feedback within a month we will close this bug as resolved. > > Thank you for your understanding. Just tested, it still does not work in 2.4.1 Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/32 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-06-04T14:42:11+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: Thank yo for the fast feedback. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/33 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-06-05T12:01:19+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: >From Amarok Development Sprint Randa 2011: Ralf, could you have a look at this? This is the most hated bug in Amarok as of now. Bart suggest using bounded playback. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/34 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-09-12T14:36:38+00:00 Martin-vala wrote: (In reply to comment #27) > From Amarok Development Sprint Randa 2011: > > Ralf, could you have a look at this? This is the most hated bug in Amarok as > of > now. Bart suggest using bounded playback. Hi All, Currently i am testing Amarok 2.4.3 and finaly it is working. But still one small bug. When new song starts time of song still stays on 0:00 and it is playing first song again. But when i click on progress bar for example to 0:01 then correct song starts to play. I think this is is quite easy to fix. After that i will be soooo happy to play cue with ogg. Thanks Ciao Martin Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/35 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-09-12T17:22:37+00:00 sdeber wrote: Created attachment 63593 CUE file Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/36 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-09-12T17:24:38+00:00 sdeber wrote: (In reply to comment #28) > (In reply to comment #27) > > From Amarok Development Sprint Randa 2011: > > > > Ralf, could you have a look at this? This is the most hated bug in Amarok > > as of > > now. Bart suggest using bounded playback. > > Hi All, > > Currently i am testing Amarok 2.4.3 and finaly it is working. But still one > small bug. When new song starts time of song still stays on 0:00 and it is > playing first song again. But when i click on progress bar for example to 0:01 > then correct song starts to play. > > I think this is is quite easy to fix. > > After that i will be soooo happy to play cue with ogg. > > Thanks > > Ciao > > Martin It does not seem to work for me, for example the file attached in Comment #29 is not recognized by the collection manager. I also tried to rename the file to CDImage.cue, but still it did not work. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/37 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-11-10T19:20:18+00:00 Mojedokumenty-u wrote: Confirmed in Amarok 2.4.3 on KDE 4.7.2. A user should be allowed to use an arbitrary name for the cue sheet. When a music file is commited to the collection, amarok should perform a check if a cue sheet with the same file name exists, differing only in the extension. Currently, cue sheets don't seem to work within file collection. Strangely enough, drag and drop cue file support works as expected. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/38 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-11-23T12:09:11+00:00 Wuguoxinno1 wrote: (In reply to comment #28) > (In reply to comment #27) > > From Amarok Development Sprint Randa 2011: > > > > Ralf, could you have a look at this? This is the most hated bug in Amarok > > as of > > now. Bart suggest using bounded playback. > > Hi All, > > Currently i am testing Amarok 2.4.3 and finaly it is working. But still one > small bug. When new song starts time of song still stays on 0:00 and it is > playing first song again. But when i click on progress bar for example to 0:01 > then correct song starts to play. > > I think this is is quite easy to fix. > > After that i will be soooo happy to play cue with ogg. > > Thanks > > Ciao > > Martin I have the same problem with you! I also find that after it played first song again,it will play the next song and after that first song will be played again.Strange bug. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/39 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2011-11-25T11:35:52+00:00 Bart-cerneels wrote: Cue sheets found in the collection folders will be supported starting version 2.6 - Detect cue-sheets in collectionscanner, report them as regular playlist files. - SqlScanResultProcessor handles cue sheets different from other playlists. Stores timecoded urls (partial playback) indatabase for each entry. - Handled as regular tracks from now on. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/40 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-01-12T04:30:23+00:00 RussianNeuroMancer wrote: Will Amarok support embedded cue sheets in FLAC, WavPack, etc? https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=230272 Will Amarok preferred tags from cue for track releases with cue? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/41 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-02-10T14:55:11+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: Setting status to NEW, else this doesn't show in the filters. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/42 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-02-10T14:57:19+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: Actually it does, but was in the wrong component, sorry for the noise. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/43 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-02-17T12:36:44+00:00 Simon-44ecklpsr wrote: @bart: is there already a branch where this can be tested? Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/44 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-04-24T12:15:58+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: *** Bug 291775 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/45 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-04-24T12:19:14+00:00 Martin-vala wrote: Any news on that? Can we test it? Ciao Martin Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/46 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-04-24T12:25:44+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: I don't think that there is anything to test yet, else Bart would have Cc'ed this report with a commit. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/47 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-05-08T11:38:20+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: Sometimes real life gets in the way, so this is pushed to 2.7 as we are about to release 2.6 and Bart doesn't find enough time to work on it right now. Sorry about that. Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/48 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ On 2012-05-08T11:45:08+00:00 Myriam Schweingruber wrote: *** Bug 279234 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/comments/49 ** Changed in: amarok Status: In Progress => Confirmed ** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #230272 https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=230272 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/45520 Title: wish: add individual tracks from .cue files into the collection To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/amarok/+bug/45520/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
