Moving to a less heavily patched upstream version including what looks like 
pretty significant fixes/improvements seems worth it to me.
It doesn't sound like the new features will be particularly user visible except 
in the cases where they'll get a working system where they wouldn't in the 
past, so I'm not seeing a problem with these either.

The testing plan mentioned on IRC, using a PPA and call for testing before 
pushing to the archive sounds good.
Having this land later this week or early next week would be ideal, any later 
would be impacting beta 2.

In case of major non-trivially fixable regressions, the plan is to re-
upload the current 1.99 (using one of these rather ugly version
numbers).

+1

** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
       Status: Confirmed => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046890

Title:
  [FFe] grub2 2.00

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1046890/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to