it's possible to SRU with a testcase stating that the bug is hard to trigger and that testers should ensure things keep working without regression
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #683782 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683782 ** Also affects: gst-plugins-good via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683782 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: gst-plugins-good0.10 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: gst-plugins-good0.10 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Triaged ** Also affects: gst-plugins-good0.10 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gst-plugins-good0.10 (Ubuntu Precise) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: gst-plugins-good0.10 (Ubuntu Precise) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068155 Title: pulsesink: Segfault in pulsesink.c:2077 gst_pulsesink_pad_acceptcaps() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gst-plugins-good/+bug/1068155/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
