> Maybe :-) Let's see what some other programs say… > > apt-get: The following packages have been kept back > aptitude: The following packages have been kept back > > I'd say that “kept” is the way to go here. However… > The user part of me: I'd like all my packages "to be kept" after an operation, except those which are "to be removed".
> > rgchangeswindow.cc still has a “To be kept” in addition to held. > > That's still not a friendly string for me. > Looks like something has fallen away over time here, and this is something > to look at before fixing the apparent string issues. I am not very > familiar with synaptic, but can take a look later next week when I get > some available time. > That would be great! > > > What do you think of Upgradeable in place of Unchanged and "n packages > > upgradeable but not upgraded" in the summary? > > As long as you mean, “Upgradeable, kept back” However, to save > on translations, the string “To be kept” (from rgchangeswindow.cc) may be > suitable. > No, I don't mean "Upgradeable, kept back" by "Upgradeable", as if there are any packages to be upgraded, there is a "To be upgraded" section, the other ones, which appear in the category we are discussing about, are the Upgradeable ones. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398184 Title: Synaptic sometimes lists 'unchanged' in to-do list - confusing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/398184/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
