(In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Same here. Really annoying for VLC user. > > > > I'm not familar with pa so I cannot say whether this patch is has something > > wrong or not. !!!!!!!But this commit broken the userspace!!!!!!! Should > > it be reverted? > > > > It's 7 month after this bug has been reported. Should the developer say > > something to show that this bug is not totally ignored? > > Sure, I can say something. The problematic commit implements a useful > feature, so it probably won't be simply reverted. A better fix is needed > (patches very welcome). There have been fixes related to the sample rate > updating since pulseaudio 2.0, so it's worth retrying with pulseaudio 3.0, > but I don't remember that those fixes would have been timing related, so > don't expect too much.
Thinking a bit more, reverting the patch (or maybe commenting out the code would be better) is maybe the right approach after all, if nobody submits a better fix. Removing the code that was added that patch shouldn't really break anything, the only effect should be that there's sometimes unnecessary resampling, which is better than breaking the timing of applications. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069232 Title: Sound lags when opening video files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pulseaudio/+bug/1069232/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
