No On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Scott Kitterman <ubu...@kitterman.com> wrote: > Do we need the newer version of cclive too? > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1221626 > > Title: > [FFe] Sync clive 2.3.3+cclive (universe) from Debian unstable (main) > > Status in “clive” package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > Please sync clive 2.3.3+cclive (universe) from Debian unstable (main) > > This turns clive into a transitional package to cclive, which supports > all of the existing features. clive is no longer maintained in debian > from this upload. > > Changelog entries since current saucy version 2.3.3-2: > > clive (2.3.3+cclive) unstable; urgency=low > > [ Salvatore Bonaccorso ] > * Change Vcs-Git to canonical URI (git://anonscm.debian.org) > > [ Ansgar Burchardt ] > * Make clive a transition package to cclive. (Closes: #712644) > * Make /usr/bin/clive a wrapper script that emits a warning and then calls > cclive. > * Use debhelper compat level 9. > * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.4. > > -- Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> Mon, 02 Sep 2013 21:23:34 > +0200 > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clive/+bug/1221626/+subscriptions
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1221626 Title: [FFe] Sync clive 2.3.3+cclive (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clive/+bug/1221626/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs