I'm the Debian maintained. This will be going to unstable; I an merely waiting for the release managers' permission to upload since gdal and dolfin depend on armadillo.
Both gdal and dolfin require a binNMU, that's all. But the release team is backed up, so I am waiting for their go ahead. This shouldn't be viewed as a reason for armadillo to be considered "less stable"; the experimental upload was to clear the NEW queue. Kumar Julian Taylor <jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote: >On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 3:00 AM, conrad_s ><1268...@bugs.launchpad.net>wrote: > >> Armadillo 4.000 contains many speedups and new functionality. >> > >faster and new is unfortunately sometimes equivalent to broken in the >first >release. >I'm more interested in bug fixes that are in 4.000 but not in currently >available trusty version. > >I'm not outright rejecting syncing it, but I would like the Debian >maintainers opinion on that too. I fear it is in Debian experimental >for a >reason. >If he/she plans to package bugfix releases swiftly it can be done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1268540 Title: Sync armadillo 1:4.000.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/armadillo/+bug/1268540/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
