Kristian Hermansen wrote: > So, if we can't modify the package, does that mean that you want the > same package in repositories twice, one with the web interface > dependencies, and on without? I think the web interface is a huge > part of msf3, especially for people who will be using it on Ubuntu. > If we left that out, it would be a major detriment. Otherwise, we > would need th same package in the repos twice (metasploit3 and > metasploit3-web)...
Sure, but the control file that i paste is from my package for personal use only, and i need to split ;) > I just wanted to make sure the package name was termed correctly. If > you make the package RECOMMEND 'svn' apt will not resolve this > package, as it is not valid. svn is the command name and not the > package name. Yes, pedantics are my specialty :-p Yes, and i am pedantic. So i say, that line is a comment, no a control file line, so i think i can use a friendly alias. And now, like pedantic guys, i think we need a huge beer. -- [needs-packaging] Metasploit Framework 3.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
