On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Dave Cheney <1276...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:37 PM, Antonio Rosales > <1276...@bugs.launchpad.net>wrote: > >> After discussion John and Dan the mapping for arm and ppc should look >> like: >> >> aarch64 should map to arm64 >> > > This one should be the other way around > > >> ppc64 should map to ppc64el
Apologies, there's a couple points of confusion here. To be explicit: uname -m returns: ppc64le, aarch64 dpkg uses: ppc64el, arm64 Yes, the le/el is transposed between the two ppc64 ones. Weird, I know. Yes, we said ppc64 above but I'm saying ppc64le now. This is because code inspection shows that juju is using 'uname -m' here in the script it passes to the manual provisioned hosts, and this wasn't clear when we asked a ppc64el/le porter about it. I explicitly asked our porter friend to run 'uname -m', and he confirmed it returns "ppc64le". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1276909 Title: error detecting hardware characteristics: unrecognised architecture: aarch64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1276909/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
